Skip to content
DEMOinvented companies and contracts · nothing stored or sent
LawyerSwipe Register

AI drafts. A lawyer signs.

The AI wrote it. A licensed lawyer has to stand behind it.

When two companies clash, an AI can propose a resolution in seconds. It cannot swear an oath, carry malpractice cover, or answer to a bar. So LawyerSwipe hands a licensed lawyer one job.

The contract's deciding words go in red. Every citation and figure the AI leans on is checked against them. Then the lawyer signs it, declines it, or modifies the terms.

Try the workbench Mediate four disputes
  • No confidence percentages
  • No machine signs
  • One state at a time

The workbench

The contract on the left. What the AI leans on, checked, on the right.

MEDIATION
Invented companies
The dispute

The contract

Deciding words in red

What the AI's proposal rests on

Citations checked

The AI's proposed resolution

    A proposal, not a ruling: it binds neither company unless both agree, and it is only a draft until a lawyer signs. The checks read the citations. The terms are the lawyer's.

    Try to sign it. Then try Modify.

    Why a signature has to mean something

    The people who most need a lawyer are the ones the AI is failing.

    Courts now keep a count of filings with AI-invented content. Every figure below links to its source.

    2,095

    court decisions found with hallucinated content from generative AI, updated Sept 28, 2026.

    Charlotin database
    1,208

    of those were filed by people without a lawyer. 829 were filed by lawyers. 137 were family law.

    Same database, by party and field
    17–33%

    of answers from leading legal-research AI tools were wrong or misleading in a Stanford test.

    Stanford RegLab
    92%

    of the serious civil legal problems of low-income Americans got no or too little legal help.

    Legal Services Corporation, 2022

    “When people are in court without a lawyer, bad things happen.”

    Indiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson, on family and civil courts where 60 percent of family law litigants had no lawyer in 2013 (IAALS)

    The public is asking AI legal questions because a lawyer is out of reach. The fix is not to stop them. It is to put a licensed lawyer's real review between the answer and the person.

    How it decides

    No model in the checks. No made-up percentages.

    The machine checks

    A citation passes only if its quoted words appear verbatim in the contract and its numbers, dates and weekdays agree with the quote. A term the contract contains that the proposal never mentions is flagged as missing. A quote that is not in the contract at all is flagged as invented.

    The machine does not decide

    A statement that goes beyond the contract's words, such as who wins a disputed reading, is marked as the AI's reading and gets no score, because that one is yours to judge.

    A lawyer signs, modifies or declines

    No confidence percentage is shown: none has been measured on legal drafts, and inventing one would be the failure this is built to catch.

    Try it

    Mediate four disputes

    Swipe right to sign, left to decline, or modify the terms.

    State by state

    Where a question would be held today.

    Family law

    Ask a plain question, then play the lawyer.

    For lawyers

    Your license, your client, your fee.

    Sources

    1. AI Hallucination Cases Database, Damien Charlotin, updated Sept 28, 2026. damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations
    2. Magesh, Surani, Dahl, Suzgun, Manning, Ho. Hallucination-Free? Assessing the Reliability of Leading AI Legal Research Tools. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2025. Stanford RegLab
    3. Legal Services Corporation, The Justice Gap, 2022. justicegap.lsc.gov
    4. IAALS, High Numbers of Self-Represented Litigants Left Underserved by Family Courts, citing Indiana's State of the Judiciary (2013). iaals.du.edu